Don't Write Off DAC

4 November 2025
The energy penalty of capturing CO
2 from a diffuse source is smaller than you might expect.

Many people believe that direct air capture (DAC) is fundamentally misguided. Capturing CO2 from the atmosphere requires separating it from the much more abundant nitrogen and oxygen. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, while rising, is only 0.425%. By contrast, flue gas from a power plant contains about 10% CO2 by volume. If we want to remove carbon, surely it’s wiser to extract it from flue gases rather than from atmospheric CO2, right?

Thermodynamics can tell us the minimum energy required to separate a mixture of two gases. I’ve plotted the results below for 1) the atmosphere and 2) a flue gas with 10% CO2. What is striking is that, even though the flue gas contains 225 times more CO2, it only requires 2.5 times more energy to “unmix” it and obtain a mole of CO2 than from the atmosphere.

I was really surprised by this because I expected the difference to be closer to ~100 times, since the difference in concentration is ~225.

image-20251025221337694

So the energy penalty of capturing CO2 from a diffuse source is smaller than you might think.

If we plot more values, we can see that the higher the CO2 concentration in a gas, the easier it is to unmix and capture a mole of CO2. At the far right of the graph, it takes zero energy to extract CO2 from a stream with 100% CO2—which seems obvious. But it’s worth noting that the energy difference between 425 ppm (atmosphere) and a 10% is only about 40%. Granted, flue gases drastically differ in their composition of CO2, but 5-30% is a pretty solid range

image-20251025221358495

DAC can still be cost competitive

Let's compare the lifetime costs of a DAC plant compared with a CCS plant designed to capture CO2 from a flue gas with 10% concentration. We will further assume that 50% of the lifetime cost of the DAC plant goes directly towards capturing the CO2. The rest of the plant needs to be 37.5% cheaper than a CCS plant in order for the two to have the same lifetime cost, as shown in the following diagram:

image-20251025221419142

Don't write off DAC!